Roe 8 project ‘like Barnett Government throwing sand in the face of our ancestors’ says Beeliar Wetlands Aboriginal custodian


As bulldozers moved into position yesterday to resume clearing of bushland in the path of the controversial Roe 8 highway project through Perth’s Beeliar Wetlands, Beeliar Aboriginal custodian Corina Abraham said that by ‘desecrating this place, it’s like the Barnett Government is throwing sand in the face of our ancestors’.

In an echo of the recent Standing Rock US indigenous protest, Aboriginal people from other parts of Australia have taken up residence at the Beeliar Wetlands Protectors Camp on North Lake Road Coolbellup over the last month to support local Aboriginal custodians like Ms Abraham.[1]

One WA Government policy document has identified the Beeliar wetlands area to be impacted by Roe 8 as ‘the most significant [Aboriginal] historical site within the Perth metropolitan region south of the Swan River’.[2]

The project will impact a highly significant sacred site in the Bibra Lake (Lake Walliabup) and North Lake (Lake Coolbellup) area, while archaeological research suggests the area has been an important Aboriginal campsite and meeting place for thousands of years, partly because of abundant wildlife, including freshwater turtles, ducks, swans and gilgies which are still present to this day. Ms Abraham states that Aboriginal people from all over the State regularly camped in the area up until the 1970s: ‘my grandfather used to camp there, and one of my aunties was actually born there in the 1950s.’

In 2015, Aboriginal Affairs Minister Peter Collier’s advisory group, the Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee (ACMC), reversed its earlier February 2013 recommendation against granting consent to the project under the Aboriginal Heritage Act (AHA), after deciding in controversial circumstances that a significant archaeological site in the Roe 8 pathway was no longer a site, on the basis of a cursory investigation by Department of Aboriginal Affairs archaeologists which involved digging a 20cm pit. [3] WA Greens MLC Lynn McLaren has since called for a proper archaeological excavation of the deregistered site.[4]

At the time of the ACMC decision, the committee had only two Aboriginal members (one of them a State Government employee).[5] Although s 28 (3) of the AHA prescribes that the ACMC must have a specialist anthropologist, the position has been vacant since 2013.

Unusually for a major project of this nature, Minister Collier’s Roe 8 Aboriginal heritage approval contains no requirements for an Aboriginal heritage management plan or Aboriginal monitoring of works.[6]

In 2016, Corina Abraham unsuccessfully challenged the flawed Roe 8 Aboriginal heritage approval process in the WA Supreme Court. Federal Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg is required to make a decision on her application under Federal Aboriginal heritage legislation after 11 January.

‘This place is as important for Noongar people as the South Perth Windmill or ANZAAC Cove is for non-Aboriginal people, ‘says Ms Abraham. ‘All our old fellas lived here, and they died here too. It’s like a big church to us, it’s a place of meaning, a place where we come when we’re feeling down and out: we come and connect when we’re feeling lost. Whether you go down the right path or the wrong path, you come back to this place, and you feel connected’.

‘Building a big highway through here is not going to bring strength, it’s going to bring devastation. It’s going to bring death. It’s going to bring sorrow to our community, and particularly our Aboriginal community, because it’s going through such a significant area, a cultural area that means a lot to us.’[7]

AHAA Media: Steve 0404 674 261

Aboriginal custodian of Beeliar Wetlands area: Corina Abraham 0415 099 819

WA Department of Aboriginal Affairs media: Damian Katich 6551 8172 or 040 988 1920.

Federal Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg: 02 6277 7920


[2] EPA Bulletin 1088 February 2003, 14f:





[7] For further testimony on the significance of the North Lake and Lake Coolbellup area to Noongar people, see statements at 2011 rally by Revd. Sealin Garlett and Corina Abraham at:

35 Aboriginal heritage sites wrongly removed are yet to be afforded protection by the state

Thirty five Aboriginal heritage sites that were wrongly removed from the protection of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 since 2011, are still yet to be reinstated to the heritage register by the WA government. This is despite it being more than a year after the Perth Supreme Court in December 2014 found the WA government’s removal of these sites from the register was invalid. In the meantime, these sites that have been wrongly removed from the state register are receiving NO LEGAL PROTECTION from the legislation.

2016-02-26 QWON DAA Review of 35 Heritage Places

2016-02-26 QWON DAA Review of 35 Heritage Places

The Vanishing Tribe of the West Kimberley

The Yawijibaya people, reported to be ‘giants of the north’ stood up to 7ft tall and were of superior physical makeup. They lived on the High Cliffy Islands near Montgomery Reef in the West Kimberley, subsisting off the rich marine ecosystem of the area. Soon after this footage was captured in 1929 the tribe of 300 people disappeared without a trace. Another facet of Western Australia’s fascinating history.

NOTE: This footage is shared from ‘Sovereign Union’ Facebook page, original text is posted below. 

One of the tribes that disappeared without trace.

Off the north-west coast of Western Australia is the High Cliffy Islands, home to the Yawijibaya people. Archaeological evidence suggests they have occupied these islands for 7000 years. Anthropologists described them as giants up to 7 ft tall and of superior physical makeup.

Soon after this footage was captured in 1929 the entire tribe consisting of some 300 individuals disappeared. Without a trace.

Research links:
Aboriginal adaptation in Northwest Australia / by Valda J. Blundell.

The stone house structures of high Cliffy Island, North West Kimberley, WA – Sue O’Connor –

WA Supreme Court’s rejection of Beeliar Wetlands EPA approval will embolden Noongar custodians to challenge flawed Aboriginal heritage approvals for Roe 8 project

Screen Shot 2015-12-16 at 3.03.45 PM

Image from

Noongar custodians of the Beeliar Wetlands area have welcomed today’s decision in the Supreme Court by Chief Justice Martin to overturn the Barnett Government’s EPA approval of the Roe 8 project, which would have destroyed one of the most significant historical and mythological places for Aboriginal people in the entire Perth metropolitan area.

It is noteworthy that the EPA also ignored its own guidelines on Aboriginal heritage protection in granting Roe 8 approval (see attached EPA appeal submission).

Justice Martin’s decision means Noongar opponents of the Roe 8 project will redouble their efforts to protect this culturally significant area by challenging the similarly flawed and dishonest Aboriginal heritage approval for Roe 8 presided over by the Department of Aboriginal Affairs and Minister Peter Collier (see attached DAA internal assessment report).

In granting s 18 Aboriginal heritage approval for the Roe 8 project to impact Aboriginal sites in the Beeliar Wetlands area, DAA’s advisory committee (the ACMC), first determined in highly controversial circumstances that two archaeological sites in the Roe 8 pathway were no longer sites, then reversed its earlier February 2013 decision to reject the project on Aboriginal heritage grounds.[1]

Today’s decision parallels Justice Chaney’s April 2015 Robinson v ACMC Aboriginal heritage decision which found that DAA’s deregistration of a sacred site in Port Hedland Harbour was also legally invalid. Chief Justice Wayne Martin has also previously ruled that EPA approvals for Woodside’s James Price Point LNG project were unlawful, due to conflicts of interest by EPA Board members involved in the approvals process[2] (the JPP project had also earlier been found to be invalid on another legal point, after it was discovered the  WA Government had botched the land acquisition document).[3]

All three cases highlight the extent to which the State Government has attempted to subvert due environmental and Aboriginal heritage approval process through direct political manipulation.

It is indeed heartening that the WA Supreme Court has taken such a firm line against these attempts by the Barnett Government to run WA as a state of exception operating outside the rule of law, with scant disregard for its legislative responsibility to protect Aboriginal and environmental heritage.



AHAA Media: Dr Stephen Bennetts 0404674261



For further information documents on the Beeliar wetlands, see the EPA Submission by Dr Stephen Bennetts of AHAA and the Department of Aboriginal Affairs internal site assessment by clicking the respective links below.

final epa submission S Bennetts

InternalSite AssessmentreportDAA4107

Aboriginal Heritage Action Alliance

Email Address:                              

Let’s preserve heritage for Western Australians, preserve heritage for all!

*AHAA acknowledges all Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander peoples, their culture and their country!

2 Attachments

Preview attachment final epa submission S Bennetts.pdf

final epa submission S Bennetts.pdf

Preview attachment InternalSite AssessmentreportDAA4107.pdf

InternalSite AssessmentreportDAA4107.pdf
Click here to Reply or Forward
Using 2.78 GB

Programme Policies

Powered by

Last account activity: 2 hours ago


Aboriginal Heritage Action Alliance's profile photo
Aboriginal Heritage Action Alliance
Show details

Public Submission responses to the Aboriginal Heritage Act Amendment Bill 2014 go mostly ignored

AHAA has reviewed the 172 public submissions made on the Aboriginal Heritage Act Amendment Bill 2014, to assess the number of respondents who were generally for or against the Governments proposals. Of the 172 submissions, eight respondents were in favour of the proposals, four were somewhat against, and 158 were against the changes (not including the one submission which also had an additional 28 signatures). The breakdown of these submissions can be found below. Despite the overwhelmingly negative response to the Bill and the multitude of issues, recommendations and experience presented in these submissions, only three changes were incorporated into the final Amendment Bill 2014 that was tabled in Parliament on 27 November 2014. These were to:

1. Remove the financial penalty inserted into section 15 during the drafting of the Aboriginal Heritage Amendment Bill 2014 in order to mitigate any unintended consequences,

2. To redraft section 18 and related provisions to require that a decision-maker ‘must’ rather than ‘may’ do something with an application,

3. And to remove references to ‘honorary wardens’ in sections 51 & 52.

Submission Received By: (Generally) For or Against AHAB?
The Hon Robin Chapple MLC Against
Ben Wyatt MLA Against
Katanning LCDC For
Adele Millard Consultancy Services Against
Mr Paddy Cullen Against
Stevens Heritage Services Against
Mr Paul Watson Against
Dr Thor Kerr; Dr Shaphan Cox; Dr Robert Briggs from Curtin University Against
Mr Nicholas Herriman Against
Kulyamba Aboriginal Corporation Against
SJC Heritage Consultants Against
The Law Society of Western Australia Against
The City of Swan
Ms Sandra Kelly Against
Mr Iva Hayward-Jackson Against
Ngarluma Aboriginal Corporation Against
Anglican Social Responsibilities Commission Against
Mr Justin Larsen Against
Kimberley Land Council Against
Western Desert Lands Aboriginal Corporation Against
Goldfields Land and Sea Council Against
Polygon Archaelogy Heritage Services Against
Ms Elizabeth Vaughan Against
Rhoads Bird Associates Against
Swan River People (Mr Albert Corunna; Kathy Penny; Richard Wilkes; Greg Garlett; Bella Bropho) Against
Ms Talila Milroy Against
Friends of Australian Rock Art Against
Horizon Power For
Central Desert Native Title Services Against
Ms Roberta Circosta Against
Kuruma Marthudunera Aboriginal Corporation Against
Karlka Nyiyaparli Aboriginal Corporation Against
National Native Title Council Against
The Chamber of Minerals and Energy of Western Australia For
Iron Ore Holdings Ltd For
Gavin Jackson Cultural Resource Management Against
Mr Stephen Walker Against
APA Group Against-ish
National Trust of Australia (WA) Against
Yawuru Native Title Holders Aboriginal Corporation Against
Australian Archaeological Association Inc. Against
Mr Iain Davidson Against-ish
Ms Sharon Davies Against
Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation Against
Swan Valley Nyungah Community Aboriginal Corporation Against
The Association of Mining and Exploration Companies For
The Kimberley Aboriginal Law and Culture Centre Against
Pilbara Ports Authority For-ish- offers advice
Amergin Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd Against
The Wintawari Guruma Aboriginal Corporation Against
Chalk & Fitzgerald Lawyers & Consultants Against
Terra Rosa Cultural Resource Management Against-ish
Goolarabooloo Millibinyarri Indigenous Corporation Against
The Marra Worra Worra Aboriginal Corporation Against
The Mullewa Wadjari People Against
AMPLA Neutral- offers technical legal advice
Earth Creations – Environmental Art Research and Training Against
KRED Enterprises Pty Ltd Against
The Yaburara and Coastal Mardudhunera Aboriginal Corporation Against
Rio Tinto For
Dortch and Cuthbert Against
The Anthropological Society of Western Australia Against
Australia ICOMOS Against
Ms Betty Logan JP and other signees Against* (+ an additional 28 signatures)
Archaeological & Heritage Management Solutions Against-ish
South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council Against
Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority Against
Anthropos Australis
Shire of Broome For
Australian Association of Consulting Archeologists Inc. Against
Ms Dianne Stevens Against
*Ms Melinda Wilson Against
*Submissions have been lodged in the same or closely similar terms by Laura Thomas, Kree Eyre, Christin Kohler, Shanice Smyth, Danny Carter, Candice Veitch, Skye Wilson, Amy Rorke, Kathryn Black, Joanne Walshaw, Caroline Seawright, Todd Beaton, Clare Presser, Caycia Byars, Margaret Hope, Mengar Thomas, Richard Erickson, Alex Herewane, Helen Russo, Angela Weekes, Glen Risk, Brydie Naismith, Brecon Walsh, Georgiana Ologeanu, Geoffrey Hill, Kristen Day, Janette Rhodes, Ayla Erken, Elizabeth Owen, Hollice Rundle, Susan Chalcroft, Debra Williams, Catherine Menzies, Tara Blackman, Beverley Slater, Lisa Owen, Phylis Read, S.K. Riley, Stephen Franzini, Ailsa Turrell, Laurel Alexander, Megan Porter, Catherine Harburn, Richard Lanyon, Dani Rosendorff, Cheryl Bell, Jesse Holly, Tracey Ashmore, Doreen Anderson, Kim Seater, Kylie Farmer, Lee West, Patrick Greechan, Simon Golley, Ines Portugal, David Joseph, Mia Madsen, Ann Kennedy, Breony Carbines, Heidi Mippy, Jessica Fairbairn, Rita Gyorffy, Clare Kennedy, Tyson Mowarin, Jayne Alexander, Craig Heading, Jan Rock, Vickey Hill, Mark Ditcham, Lorene Stewart, Walter McGuire, Irene Gale, Dan Musil, Liz Mackie, Therese Quinland, Andrea Hilton, John Terry, Simone Watson, Darren Irwin, Spider Redgold, Cindylee Smallman, George Theodoridis, Patrick Hudson, Chris Osborn, Julie Dowling, Marjan Kiewiet, Lisa Kitney, Bronwyn Evans, Sandra Hill, Genevieve Murphy, Marcella Maloney, Peter Zuvela, Alie Arjaans, Anne-Marie Smith and Brenda Hill. Against* (an additional 95 individuals)
 TOTAL 8 For
4 Somewhat against

1 Somewhat for

158 Against




letterhead AHAA



WA’s Aboriginal Heritage Action Alliance (AHAA) is marking today’s Yule River bush meeting of Aboriginal custodians[1] with a call to the State’s Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Peter Collier for the reinstatement of 36 Aboriginal sacred sites which were unlawfully deregistered by the Department of Aboriginal Affairs’ Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee (ACMC).

The sites were all deregistered following applications by developers to ‘disturb’ them under s 18 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act (AHA). Minister Collier later granted s 18 ministerial consents for 37 sacred sites to be ‘disturbed’. The WA Supreme Court’s Justice Chaney ruled in a landmark Port Hedland test case on April 1 that the narrow definition of ‘sacred site’ used by the ACMC to deregister one of the 37 sites was invalid, and referred the site back to the ACMC for reassessment.[2]

Minister Collier later tabled in State Parliament the names of 36 sacred sites which had been unlawfully deregistered using the same flawed and narrow State Solicitor’s Office interpretation of ‘sacred site’ under s 5b of the AHA which was overturned by Justice Chaney.[3] 34 out of 36 of these sites were said to be the subject of actual or proposed development.[4] He also stated on 15 September that 11 previously registered sites had been removed from the DAA site register since the Chaney ruling on 1 April this year.

Given these circumstances, and DAA’s lack of response to Chaney’s Robinson v ACMC since April, AHAA today announced it was ‘doing what DAA should have done five months ago, and is writing to Aboriginal custodians of all the deregistered sites’, urging them to demand the immediate reinstatement of all 36 sacred sites to the DAA site register.

Yamatji man and AHAA spokesperson Clayton Lewis, a senior custodian of one of the 37 deregistered sacred sites, said today: ‘It’s ironic that Justice Chaney delivered his decision on April Fool’s Day, because DAA’s response since then has been a bit like a bad April Fool’s Day joke’.

‘Nearly six months on, I haven’t received any correspondence from DAA admitting they unlawfully deregistered the important Monger’s Lake Waterway sacred site in our country in the Mid-west, or telling us what they propose to do about it. We’re not aware DAA has contacted a single custodian for any of the other 36 sacred sites, or published a revised version of the DAA Guidelines which Justice Chaney said were legally invalid’.

‘We also don’t know whether Peter Collier has withdrawn any of the legally invalid s 18 ministerial consents he issued to developers, or whether the companies have already gone ahead and destroyed the sites’.

AHAA is currently seeking legal advice as to whether Aboriginal custodians of these sites could sue the Minister, the ACMC or the State Government if any of the sites have been damaged. The Aboriginal heritage advocacy group is today also releasing the attached map showing the location of the deregistered sacred sites, as well as a further 83 ceremonial and/or mythological sites deregistered under the Barnett Government since 2008 which have been identified by University of Western Australia Archaeology Department researchers Dr Joe Dortch and Dr Tom Sapienza.[5] The Minister has also stated in Parliament that a further 16 (so far unidentified) sacred sites failed DAA registration solely on the basis of the SSO’s flawed s 5b sacred site definition.[6]

‘Given these sacred sites were wrongly deregistered by DAA in the first place, why hasn’t it just put them back on the register?’ asks Lewis. ‘The Minister and his DAA Executives recently made a big song and dance in Parliament saying that all 37 sites now need to go through a complicated reassessment process which might take DAA months and months.[7] This seems pretty strange, given that under its current Chair, the ACMC has been able to assess dozens of sites literally before lunch time, many of them unfavourably.[8] As far as we know, DAA still hasn’t reassessed a single one of the 37 deregistered sacred sites. We also can’t understand why the Minister thinks Justice Chaney’s decision needs to be referred back to the State Solicitor’s Office for further advice, when it was the SSO which caused the problem in the first place by providing its ridiculous definition of a sacred site’.

Clayton Lewis’s 3 August letter to the Minister requesting immediate reinstatement of the Monger’s Lake Waterway sacred site, of which he is a senior custodian, has received no response to date. See:

Deregistration of DAA s5b sacred sites under the Barnett Government (2008-2015)

The location of the deregistered sacred sites, as well as a further 83 ceremonial and/or mythological sites deregistered under the Barnett Government since 2008 which have been identified by University of Western Australia Archaeology Department researchers Dr Joe Dortch and Dr Tom Sapienza.


For expert commentary on the DAA site deregistration issue:

Dr Stephen Bennetts: 0404674261

Greg McIntyre SC: 0408097046

Dr Joe Dortch: 0428601008

[1]; for Aboriginal opposition to the WA Government’s Aboriginal heritage policy at last year’s meeting, see:







[8]; Sitewatch report.


[8]; Sitewatch report.

More de-registered sites since the Supreme Court decision on invalid interpretation of Section 5b (sacred, ritual, ceremonial sites)

The latest parliamentary questions from the Hon. Robin Chapple and the Hon. Lynn McLaren from the WA Greens highlight more Aboriginal sites that have been removed from the Aboriginal sites register since the Port Hedland Port Supreme Court test case. In April 2015 the Supreme Court found the Aboriginal Cultural Material Committee’s interpretation of Section 5b of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (which defines sacred, ritual and ceremonial sites) was invalid. AHAA question the governments de-registration of these sites in light of the Supreme Court decision, and asks on what basis they are continuing to de-register Aboriginal sites. See the following link for the recent parliamentary questions asked Wed 16 September 2015. 2015-09-16 QWON 11 more sites removed ACMC

The following parliamentary questions relates to Roe 8 and registered site ‘Bibra Lake’.

2015-09-16 QWON Sites on Bibra Lake

World heritage hopes pinned on archaeological dig in Burrup Peninsula industrial heartland

Ancient secrets of Burrup revealed

Archaeologists are working to provide firm dates for Aboriginal presence on Murujuga (Burrup Peninsula). Murujuga was one of the sites affected by the large-scale state sanctioned de-registrations of Aboriginal heritage sites in WA  (here and here). Murujuga ranger Geoffrey Togo hopes the archaeological finds “will make the Government listen and agree with what we as Aboriginal people are saying, that these sites need to be protected”.

The full article is available on ABC News.

Let’s stop stamping on sacred ground

“When ISIS smashes ancient Assyrian sculptures in Iraq or Roman ruins in Syria’s Palmyra, they are barbarians destroying the world’s patrimony.

When a crawler tractor crushes a petroglyph on the Burrup, it is just another work day in the Pilbara.”

NITV’s Michael Carey writes here about the extreme de-registrations (see here) and the disturbing lack of protection for one of Australia’s most significant heritage sites, Murujuga (Burrup Peninsula).